![]() ![]() “The District has been transparent about the condition of the Bridge with Shimmick throughout the project.” “We are deeply frustrated by Shimmick’s slow pace of construction and multiple delays building the suicide barrier,” Cosulich-Schwartz said in a written statement. The contractors allege that they toured the bridge before submitting a bid but that they were not allowed to take photographs or record video and had access only to areas chosen by district officials.ĭistrict spokesman Paolo Cosulich-Schwartz said the delays and cost overruns are due in part to Shimmick having had three different owners since beginning work on the suicide barrier. ![]() A spokesperson for Shimmick said that was done for security reasons and that it will be up to the judge to make the information public. The alleged problem with the platforms remains unclear because the information was redacted from the court documents. including extensive deterioration in certain areas of the bridge.”Īccording to the joint venture, the deterioration is mainly in the maintenance platforms - U-shaped structures known as travelers that are powered by diesel engines and hug the bridge on both sides and bottom to give workers access to the bridge’s underside and hard-to-reach areas. The contractors contend in the latest court documents that the district delayed the completion of the project and damaged their reputations by concealing “significant information. In the motion filed this week, they asked a judge to allow them to also sue the Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District, which manages the span. The joint venture countersued earlier this year. ![]() and Danny’s Construction Co., which formed a joint venture to handle the project, were sued last year by subcontractor Vigor Works, LLC, which claims it’s owed millions of dollars. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |